Monogamous Heterocentricism revisited:
The policially
correct ultra left wing view toward homosexuality is to push the word
"homophobia" and "heterocentric"
to stigmatize all
those who dare point out the ridiculously fucking obvious: that
there is nothing ideal nor optimal about homosexuality and
promiscuity compared to monogamous heterosexuality, all things being
equal, while pretending there is no such thing as heterophobia.
Sexphobia is
the key issue: All sex is a scary proposition given the kind of
things that can go wrong.
Here's the
Basic three: 1. UNWANTED PREGNANCIES and 2. Sexually Transmitted
Diseases. 3. The plausibility of Inciting jealousy and envy
regarding competitive elements to breed and mate.
Here's
as simple as it gets for me: Since homosexuals don't
reproduce by themselves naturally, heterosexuality, especially
monogamous heterosexuality, seems perfectly ideal and optimum for the
human race: all other things equal!
Human reproduction seems hindered, convoluted, complicated, and prone to problems that are not as likely to occurr if 1 adult man and 1 adult woman loved each other for life and produced and raised children from that union almost entirely on their own in that household. It's a simple matter of the closest distance between 2 different opposite complimentary reproductive ingredients and a loving wholesome understanding between those who have that reproductive experience.
Human reproduction seems hindered, convoluted, complicated, and prone to problems that are not as likely to occurr if 1 adult man and 1 adult woman loved each other for life and produced and raised children from that union almost entirely on their own in that household. It's a simple matter of the closest distance between 2 different opposite complimentary reproductive ingredients and a loving wholesome understanding between those who have that reproductive experience.
Any responsible
adult human being who observes unfortunate innocent souls born into
this world deprived of ideal and optimal opportunities to
successfully arrange and consecrate themselves into relationships as
monogamous mating bonding pairs, lovers, best friends, and life
partners with partners of the opposite sex
naturally and
functionally designed to compliment each other, as
1 mother and 1 father,
1 man and 1 woman,
1 husband and 1 wife, completely loyal to each other with a safe place to reproduce and raise their own biological children healthy, chaste, and free from abuse
must by every means necessary strive to annihilate all sources of deprivation of such opportunities, and categorically admit such sources of deprivation are the mortal enemies, of such human beings' who strive for such ideals and optimism
And when such human being is such an unfortunate innocent soul and recognizes these ideal principles, he must have the will power to fight to the absolute death and seek martyrdom rather than be content with an inferior lot in life. To die on one's feet standing up fighting one's enemies is always better than living grovelling as a slave. The death penalty for losing mortal combat against one's tyrannical evil enemies is always better than being content as a peon weakling crippled by filthy fucking rich plastic parasites who push an agenda that youth be undermined by such plastic parasitical pedophile pedocidal parasitical materialism whose diabolical power in this world need never manifest it's ugly fucking face ever again. Otherwise the human race is doomed to extinction.
1 mother and 1 father,
1 man and 1 woman,
1 husband and 1 wife, completely loyal to each other with a safe place to reproduce and raise their own biological children healthy, chaste, and free from abuse
must by every means necessary strive to annihilate all sources of deprivation of such opportunities, and categorically admit such sources of deprivation are the mortal enemies, of such human beings' who strive for such ideals and optimism
And when such human being is such an unfortunate innocent soul and recognizes these ideal principles, he must have the will power to fight to the absolute death and seek martyrdom rather than be content with an inferior lot in life. To die on one's feet standing up fighting one's enemies is always better than living grovelling as a slave. The death penalty for losing mortal combat against one's tyrannical evil enemies is always better than being content as a peon weakling crippled by filthy fucking rich plastic parasites who push an agenda that youth be undermined by such plastic parasitical pedophile pedocidal parasitical materialism whose diabolical power in this world need never manifest it's ugly fucking face ever again. Otherwise the human race is doomed to extinction.
REPOST) HETERO CENTRIC/HETERO CENTRIST COMES OUT OF THE CLOSET!
Basic Sexual ethics: 1. Between adult
humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4.
and
hopefully/preferably non-violent.
It is the intent of SpiralCosmosArt to ask that
•
extreme right wing bible thumping conservatives who hate non-
heterosexuals/homosexuals/transgenders/queers/lesbians/bisexuals etc.
and
•
extreme left wing liberals who want to militantly push the extreme opposite agenda and suffer
from heterophobia
to consider that sometimes non-heterosexuality (queering / homosexuality/ and trans-genderism) is
coerced by “endocrine disrupters that tweak and permanently warp the hormones of such people for
life, and a lot of other causal factors that are open to debate, often from cruel dirty tricks of
competition, abuse, and coercive population control agendas, being completely respectful of the fact
that there is good scientific reason thatmost a substantial number of people's sexual
orientation really is a result of being“born
that way” and they really “don't have a choice”, and cannot change and are human beings who deserve
human rights like anyone else, including whatever perceived blessings they expect to get out of a State
sanctioned “marriage”, or even adoption rights of children if there is no monogamous heterosexual role
models or family life available worth a shit and 4 ethical principles of sex are never violated: 1.
Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4. preferably non-violent
Unless I am single and concerned about seeking out a monogamous heterosexual woman to seek to reciprocate my monogamous heterosexuality and have lots of good loving monogamous sex, which I often am, I usually don't really care what other people's sex life is like in their private life, Provided These 4 PRINCIPLES 1. between adult human beings, 2. mutual consensual and 3. private. 4. preferably non-violent I am a libertarian in that regard. I'm all in favor of legalizing state sanctioned marriage for gays, but find it kind of amusing how a gay man told me once "gay people should have the right to get screwed by the state like straight people." State approval for whether or not adults' sexuality is designed to fuck over those who seek such approval and has nothing to do with whether or not they are gay or straight.
I stand by the notion heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal for human survival given all other things being equal. It is important that I stress "all other things being equal". I believe heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal, without going into the graphic details of anatomical reasons, for the most simple reason: because heterosexual monogamy involves only 2 party extreme love and pleasure energy transaction of co-creators for reproduction with energy and bodies that compliments each other to produce synergy, where as homosexuals don't reproduce on their own and need 3rd party sperm donation to reproduce, and often sex toys a lot like some people are born into this world needing prosthetic limbs. Promiscuous non-monogamy (whether gay or straight) seems to complicate the energy exchange diluting the possibilities of optimum synergy and love with much risk of that love being diluted, subverted and undermined through jealousy while trying to juggle multiple partners in vain.
For those who disagree with heterosexual monogamy being optimal and ideal. Perhaps your idea of evidence for failed heterosexual monogamous societies is pointing out all the legacies of failed societies rather than looking at the principles of failed gender balance? without taking into account and consideration that a lot of the failed heterosexual societies are really infested with a lot of pedophiles who are coercing children into homosexuality?
Think about how subversive and cruel pedophilia is.
Maybe you are not taking into account the brutal mating competition done by heterosexuals who are really closet pedophiles, pedophiles who could be into closet homosexual or heterosexual pedophile predation?
Do you consider the damage and confusion child victims of sex offender causes? Through somekind of brutal mating competition?
You want evidence? What kind of historical anecdote after anecdote of polyamorous/polygamous/ and/or homosexual societies where there is trouble do you need? For now to start: I can think of survivors of fundamental Mormon polygamy cults, a lot of organized religions,and maybe some others anecdotes where especially the children from such promiscuous unions are in endless feuds with their siblings indoctrinated by their parents' jealousy issues. Personally, a lot of the aftermath generation X's of the free love generation of the baby boomers have had similar issues.
When put the question is homosexuality a sin? or Is homosexuality immoral? I have to be completely true to the reality that I do not know because I can never know what it is to be homosexual, but I do know how suggestible and vulnerable children can be, and I do know how innocent people are sometimes born into the world with some kind of disability or injury with no cure through no fault of their own sometimes. I do know something about heterophobia in the sense that there is always a fear of an unwanted or difficult pregnancy: so when people throw around the buzzword "homophobia" it kind of makes me wonder wtf? WTF makes you so free of heterophobia? as though any alleged homophobia from me is any worse than your own heterophobia?
Hetero phobia is real, and everyone suffers from it from some degree or another to a certain degree. Who doesn't fear unwanted pregnancies? Who isn't afraid of certain people breeding un-sustainably?
Pedophiles, those into bestiality, and a lot of other sex offenders deserve to be annihilated off the face of the earth because it is a completely depraved level of de- sensitivity that corrodes the world. Does that mean executions? I don't know. But definitely quarantining them and rehabilitating them some way if that is even remotely possible. Children's sexuality is underdeveloped, the child has no way of knowing what's going on. Same with animals. Child sex abuse is extremely cruel given how vulnerable and suggestible children are.
There is population control agendas with all sorts of contaminents in the environment which is part of Agenda 21. Some homosexuals have no problem with me believing this and completely agree because they are completely adult consenting beings in their sex life who know damn well they don't have a choice because their hormones are hardwired and tweaked that way from birth from endocrine disruptors and other contaminents in the environment. Such homosexuals are not likely to change. But then there are another category of people who insist "don't knock being gay until you try it". That attitude is prevalent and endemic. It's totally pushed in the propaganda. There is an element that insinuates by the very nature of peer pressure that those who've grown up with bad experiences with the opposite gender can rationalize coping out of ideals and principles of optimum sexuality remaining monogamous and heterosexual, and convince themselves homosexuality is right for them, when in reality they are confused souls. Those people are fucked in the head. So what if I believe that they're fucked in the head?
I consider homosexuality to more often than not, especially among those homosexuals who keep their sex life exclusively between adults and don't recruit, to be an untreatable injury or disability from a polluted world full of contaminants known as "endocrine disruptors" and sometimes horrible experiences with the opposite gender or unmet emotional affirmations from the same gender growing up as a child, but that by NO MEANS do I believe most homosexuals have choice to be gay. Again: I don't judge and blame them for being gay in this mixed up world provided the 4 mentioned principles I listed about. But it's stupid to say that homosexuality is never coerced.
hopefully/preferably non-violent.
It is the intent of SpiralCosmosArt to ask that
•
extreme right wing bible thumping conservatives who hate non-
heterosexuals/homosexuals/transgenders/queers/lesbians/bisexuals etc.
and
•
extreme left wing liberals who want to militantly push the extreme opposite agenda and suffer
from heterophobia
to consider that sometimes non-heterosexuality (queering / homosexuality/ and trans-genderism) is
coerced by “endocrine disrupters that tweak and permanently warp the hormones of such people for
life, and a lot of other causal factors that are open to debate, often from cruel dirty tricks of
competition, abuse, and coercive population control agendas, being completely respectful of the fact
that there is good scientific reason that
that way” and they really “don't have a choice”, and cannot change and are human beings who deserve
human rights like anyone else, including whatever perceived blessings they expect to get out of a State
sanctioned “marriage”, or even adoption rights of children if there is no monogamous heterosexual role
models or family life available worth a shit and 4 ethical principles of sex are never violated: 1.
Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4. preferably non-violent
Unless I am single and concerned about seeking out a monogamous heterosexual woman to seek to reciprocate my monogamous heterosexuality and have lots of good loving monogamous sex, which I often am, I usually don't really care what other people's sex life is like in their private life, Provided These 4 PRINCIPLES 1. between adult human beings, 2. mutual consensual and 3. private. 4. preferably non-violent I am a libertarian in that regard. I'm all in favor of legalizing state sanctioned marriage for gays, but find it kind of amusing how a gay man told me once "gay people should have the right to get screwed by the state like straight people." State approval for whether or not adults' sexuality is designed to fuck over those who seek such approval and has nothing to do with whether or not they are gay or straight.
I stand by the notion heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal for human survival given all other things being equal. It is important that I stress "all other things being equal". I believe heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal, without going into the graphic details of anatomical reasons, for the most simple reason: because heterosexual monogamy involves only 2 party extreme love and pleasure energy transaction of co-creators for reproduction with energy and bodies that compliments each other to produce synergy, where as homosexuals don't reproduce on their own and need 3rd party sperm donation to reproduce, and often sex toys a lot like some people are born into this world needing prosthetic limbs. Promiscuous non-monogamy (whether gay or straight) seems to complicate the energy exchange diluting the possibilities of optimum synergy and love with much risk of that love being diluted, subverted and undermined through jealousy while trying to juggle multiple partners in vain.
For those who disagree with heterosexual monogamy being optimal and ideal. Perhaps your idea of evidence for failed heterosexual monogamous societies is pointing out all the legacies of failed societies rather than looking at the principles of failed gender balance? without taking into account and consideration that a lot of the failed heterosexual societies are really infested with a lot of pedophiles who are coercing children into homosexuality?
Think about how subversive and cruel pedophilia is.
Maybe you are not taking into account the brutal mating competition done by heterosexuals who are really closet pedophiles, pedophiles who could be into closet homosexual or heterosexual pedophile predation?
Do you consider the damage and confusion child victims of sex offender causes? Through somekind of brutal mating competition?
You want evidence? What kind of historical anecdote after anecdote of polyamorous/polygamous/ and/or homosexual societies where there is trouble do you need? For now to start: I can think of survivors of fundamental Mormon polygamy cults, a lot of organized religions,and maybe some others anecdotes where especially the children from such promiscuous unions are in endless feuds with their siblings indoctrinated by their parents' jealousy issues. Personally, a lot of the aftermath generation X's of the free love generation of the baby boomers have had similar issues.
When put the question is homosexuality a sin? or Is homosexuality immoral? I have to be completely true to the reality that I do not know because I can never know what it is to be homosexual, but I do know how suggestible and vulnerable children can be, and I do know how innocent people are sometimes born into the world with some kind of disability or injury with no cure through no fault of their own sometimes. I do know something about heterophobia in the sense that there is always a fear of an unwanted or difficult pregnancy: so when people throw around the buzzword "homophobia" it kind of makes me wonder wtf? WTF makes you so free of heterophobia? as though any alleged homophobia from me is any worse than your own heterophobia?
Hetero phobia is real, and everyone suffers from it from some degree or another to a certain degree. Who doesn't fear unwanted pregnancies? Who isn't afraid of certain people breeding un-sustainably?
Pedophiles, those into bestiality, and a lot of other sex offenders deserve to be annihilated off the face of the earth because it is a completely depraved level of de- sensitivity that corrodes the world. Does that mean executions? I don't know. But definitely quarantining them and rehabilitating them some way if that is even remotely possible. Children's sexuality is underdeveloped, the child has no way of knowing what's going on. Same with animals. Child sex abuse is extremely cruel given how vulnerable and suggestible children are.
There is population control agendas with all sorts of contaminents in the environment which is part of Agenda 21. Some homosexuals have no problem with me believing this and completely agree because they are completely adult consenting beings in their sex life who know damn well they don't have a choice because their hormones are hardwired and tweaked that way from birth from endocrine disruptors and other contaminents in the environment. Such homosexuals are not likely to change. But then there are another category of people who insist "don't knock being gay until you try it". That attitude is prevalent and endemic. It's totally pushed in the propaganda. There is an element that insinuates by the very nature of peer pressure that those who've grown up with bad experiences with the opposite gender can rationalize coping out of ideals and principles of optimum sexuality remaining monogamous and heterosexual, and convince themselves homosexuality is right for them, when in reality they are confused souls. Those people are fucked in the head. So what if I believe that they're fucked in the head?
I consider homosexuality to more often than not, especially among those homosexuals who keep their sex life exclusively between adults and don't recruit, to be an untreatable injury or disability from a polluted world full of contaminants known as "endocrine disruptors" and sometimes horrible experiences with the opposite gender or unmet emotional affirmations from the same gender growing up as a child, but that by NO MEANS do I believe most homosexuals have choice to be gay. Again: I don't judge and blame them for being gay in this mixed up world provided the 4 mentioned principles I listed about. But it's stupid to say that homosexuality is never coerced.
Rev. Phil Valentine - Re-Engineering Gender: The Systematic Rise of Homosexuality
-------------------------------------
Now:
given the facts stated above, re-visiting the seemingly innocuous
phrase ". . . I was born this way . . . takes on a more
definitive, revealing and profoundly meaningful perspective . .
Again;
for the sake of argument, let us temporarily concede that
homosexuality is " something you are born with". . If
this is the case, the 64 million dollar question then becomes . . .
.;
If
"Nature" designs an archetypal organism with inherent and
pronounced specifications. In order that these specifications
perform a particular function: said function and design to fulfill a
specific purpose, what then must be assumed if said design
specifications do not function to inevitably fulfill its ultimate
purpose . . . ??!!
Repeating
the Same Quote:
If
"Nature"
[And
we're talking about omniscient intelligence. We're talking about
something you can't comprehend. You only think you know. And many
of you are too young out there: . . . . "white man gotta god
complex" You remember that? Well that's what we're talking
about that And for you to push this nonsense on people who are
balanced within the Mahatean principle to tell us that somehow we
are to incorporate this birth defect. I still love my child if
he's got a birth defect but I'm not gonna act like I want to be part
of that defect. I'm suppose to raise that person help and care for
that person not to politically engender that so that my child who I
want to raise in Mahatean principles is suppose to go out and
experiment in it. How do you experiment at being / at doing the
things that come with a birth defect?
Listen
carefully If "Nature" designs an archetypal organism with
inherent and pronounced specifications. In order that these
specifications perform a particular function: [check me?] said
function and design to fulfill a specific purpose, what then must be
assumed if said design specifications do not function to inevitably
fulfill its ultimate purpose . . . ??!!
Put
it another way: If design denotes function, and function must
ultimately follow and fulfill the purpose of the design, what must
be assumed when the MIND OF said organism operates CONTRARTY to the
ultimate intention of the design that houses it . . ???
Answer:
A MUTATION IN ORGANO-MECHANICS. LEADING TO A MENTAL MAL-FUNCTION
OF THE ORGANISM...!!!
DESIGN
DENOTES FUNCTION
BUT
WHAT COULD POSSIBLY CAUSE A MUTATION ON ORGANO-MECHANICS,
LEADING
TO THE MENTAL MAL-FUNCTION OF AN ORGANISM . . .??!
ANSWER
. . ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS . . . !!!! "Endocrine disruptors"
YOU ALL get to KNOW that phrase. . . Because Every DAMn THING in
this Society is an Endocrine Disruptor!
And
if you can still keep your feelings for a man for a woman
and
you can still keep your feelings for a woman as a man.
Then
you gotta great chance of keeping your sanity.
Because
when they dysfunction you as a man and they dysfunction you as a
woman they take away the equilibrium that society needs in thinking
in actions in forwarding this society in
Maatian
principles[END QUOTE PHIL Valentine's Lecture]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A lot of adult mutual consenting gay
people who are born that way who don't recruit and who are totally
against pedophiles are some of the most hospitable selfless people
I've ever met because they have solidarity with the crippled and
admit to themselves of their crippled less than optimal and ideal
conditioned. If they could suddenly flawlessly grow the
opposite sex organs for their lover they'd gladly do so and be
heterosexual they would, but often there's no surgery that can ever
do that without adverse complications and in such cases I applaud
them for their open, out of the closet, claims of complete naturally
born gay pride because they really don't have a choice.
I have the utmost
respect for all incurable asexuals, celibates, homosexuals, LBQTA,
transgenders who make the best of a bad situation by zealously
seeking their true lovers, yet are severely hindered from ever
experiencing the joy and bliss of loving trusting heterosexual
monogamous lovemaking, if indeed it is not their fault, and they
really were born that way or coerced that way from the wretched
Agenda 21 perverted and parasitical elements pushing pedophilia and
endocrine disruptors and family disruption.
I have the same
utmost respect for those who must function through life with
prosthetic limbs or wheel chairs all aspiring to win a gold medal
guineess world record marathon with 2 good legs, yet somehow manage
to do well simply by virtue of stepping up to the plate and
participating in the "special olympics" instead, regardless
of how they rank, regardless if they finish last in the race or the
game . . . . These people are my heroes by virtue of their zeal to
face the challenge and pursue the ideal, however distant victory may
be.
I have the utmost
respect for all those incapable of securing a safe place to produce
children and raise children on their private organic garden farms of
sustainable productive self reliant family estates with indigineous
primitive values and morality applied , due to the systemic
bludgeoning of wage slavery, urbanization, and tyranny of all forms.
I have the utmost
respect for all those who see the idealism of heterosexual
monogamous pair bonding 2 biological parents, to each each other's
king and queen, in a world with a beautiful confederations of this
basic family unit with the two adults, that one woman and one man, of
that household's right to bear arms and the American 2nd Amendment
secured, as responsible parents, with a homeschooling collective
based on moral principles, daming the cult-hazing state sponsored
public school soft kill cult hazing terrorism to absolute hell.
Damn all those who
would disrupt this basic idealism and coerce children into sexual
promiscuity and perversion. Woe to those who deny the eternal
ecstasy of this basic yin yang bond of sovereign natural law
secured, and wholesome human reproduction. Damn the bloody
imperialistic Nanny State to hell and their poisonous vaccines, along
with all the criminal elements, (inside or outside of governments or
corporations), who kick that tumorous State-ist hornets' nests,
and encourage it to
fester and infect the human soul,
who foster the Nanny
cuntatorships and pricktatorships dicktating our lives into a country
(CUNT-tree)
determined to abduct
our children and dumb us all down into compliant dipshit addicted
sheep,
prodding us like
cattle and domesticated dumb beasts,
exploiting us again
and again generation after generation.
AND Making us all
out to be utter complete fucking fools.
Smash the sterile
agenda of y.u.p.p. 'ies.'s
(youth
undermined/urbanized/usurped into plastic perverse parasites),
by every means
necessary. . .
damn it to fucking
hell,
annihilate it and
cremate it
with tender loving
care,
as they try in vain
to cremate care at "The Bohemian Grove"
year after year.
because The Truth
can never be defeated and will
annihilate lies
eventually
This is the Rhythm
of Time that Bobby Sands wrote about [LINK HERE'
Tender loving care
is life.
Disgusting elitist
parasitical powers are death. And eventually inevitably they will
all be damned.
True noble Anarchy
is basic yin/yang, king and queen single family monarchy on organic
natural sustainable single family private estates with access to at
least all the suppressed clean energy outlaw technology of off grid
sustainability thoroughly linked on
http://exponentialaltruism.wordpress.com,
True noble Anarchy
Categorically Never was, and Not the debaucherous bull shit of
promiscuity that weird liberals sell off as "ecosexuality"
or "polyamory" "collectivism" and cliques. . .in
various insane ultra-left wing lies and bull shit that's been tried,
tested, and debunked again and again and again . . . .the entire 20th
Century and now for the past 15 years of 21st. As though Marxist
philosophy ever had any applications worth a shit?
The politically
correct ultra left wing view toward homosexuality is to push the word
"homophobia" and "heterocentric"
to stigmatize all
those who dare point out the ridiculously fucking obvious: that
there is nothing ideal nor optimal about homosexuality compared to
monogamous heterosexuality, all things being equal, while pretending
there is no such thing as heterophobia.
The politically
correct ultra left wing view is to push ultra insane feminist
supremacy of the Nanny Sate
completely
emasculate the fathers into a piece of shit tools,
and encourage the
mothers to be demoralized dingbat mamby pamby fucking brood mares,
forcing koolaid on
their own children like Jonestown, selling their souls to public
schools,
and vaccinating
and pushing pharmaceutical drugs on them,
hating everything
sacred and holy about
proper natural
sacred development
The politically
correct left wing view toward homosexuality
- completely
ignore that homosexuality is ever coerced,
- that there is
nothing defective about engaging in completely sterile sex,
and that there is
no such thing as an environment political agenda 21 to control and
crop the population through their own containments, often called
"endocrine disruptors"
While . . . The
politically correct ultra right wing view of homosexuality is to
Bible thump /Book of
Mormon Thump/ Koran Thump/ Talmud Thump
and essentially
Dogma Thump
children away from
homosexuality with biblical stories of Sodom and Gomorrah burning,
when their churches are infested with pedophile pastors and pedophile
"respectable" babysitters, molesting children and
completely crushing the children's will power to report, due to fear
of the wretched stigma. And of course they have their elitist
politicians engaging in some vile debaucherous pedophile/pedocidal
agenda to show their ass hating all life all the same in some weird
version or another. "Franklin Coverrup" "Bohemian
Grove et. al.
Sexphobia is
the key issue: All sex is a scary proposition given the kind of
things that can go wrong.
Here's the
Basic three: 1. UNWANTED PREGNANCIES and 2. Sexually Transmitted
Diseases. 3. Inciting Jealousy and envy regarding competitive
elements to breed and mate.
-------------------------------------------------------------
If you dumb fucking
AnusKissing Anarchists, especially those who claim they are some kind
of moderateness and human rights activism,
and not some over
the top left wing agenda,
who drift in some
kind of ridiculous "moral relativism" of bull shit
addiction and instant gratification hedonism,
can't figure this
out you really are all a bunch of fake mother fucking
enslaved monkeys for
the elitist filth fucking rich agenda to fuck the whole world in to
a world of shit.
Debunking Garbage
From Crimethinc: http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/atoz/adultery.php
QUOTE:
"What About the Children?"
"What about the children?"
demand the shocked sentries of the bourgeoisie when they hear about
yet another marriage endangered by an affair, terrified that their
own strayings might come out next. Well, what about them? [END QUOTE]
Debunking Garbage
From Crimethinc: http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/atoz/adultery.php
QUOTE:
Do you think you can protect the next
generation from the tragic tension between the complexity of desire
and the simplicity of social prohibitions just by knuckling under
yourself? If you smother your own aspirations for happiness,
displacing them instead onto your expectations of future generations,
you will end by smothering your children as well as yourself. Your
children would be better off growing up in a world where people dare
to be honest about what they want, whatever the consequences. Would
you prefer that they learn to beat their own longings into flattened
reminders of shame and remorse, as you do?
[END QUOTE]
I've learned long ago I don't have any influence worth anything
over an entire generation, but I know that promiscuous lifestyles
like the crimethinc idiots wants to normalize promiscuity leads to
child abandonment resentments, jealousy, and tensions that are not
likely to exist in a completely heterosexual monogamous committed
families. Polygamy/promiscuity/multiple partners was tried and
tested and failed. Sex is an extreme transaction and exchange of
life energy which optimally is designed for a balance between the
gender that produces seed and the gender that receives seed to be
impregnated and nurse another human being. When there is a
disruption and estrangement between partners, there is a recipe for
disaster that wouldn't normally exist (all things being equal)
Debunking Garbage
From Crimethinc: http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/atoz/adultery.php
QUOTE:
And it's worth pointing out that
nuclear-family monogamy, which these self-appointed judges would
protect from the assault implied by adultery, is the very thing that
replaced the broader, more fluid, extended family structures of the
past. By all accounts, children were better cared for in those
environments, and their parents had more freedom as well. Could it be
that adultery is a blind, desperate lunge for the extended community
that we once had, from the cage of the contractual relationship-or at
least could act as a stepping stone to a new form of it?
[END QUOTE]
That is all a bunch of absolute fucking lies with no facts worth a
shit to disrupt the nuclear traditional monogamous heterosexual
principles further into the toilet. Fuck you and all you assholes
that push this stupid lifestyle. You have no way of listening to or
account for living witness survivors of stupid fucking parents going
through divorces, living in sin, cheating on each other and failing
any commitments worth a shit. And I don't doubt for a moment most
other survivors of such weird households would dare disagree with
me.
Debunking Garbage
From Crimethinc: http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/atoz/adultery.php
QUOTE:
“Adultery is Marriage's Loyal Opposition.
Ultimately, adultery is only possible
because the questions it asks are left unanswered. Just like the
shoplifter, the rioter, and the suicide, the adulterer makes only
half a revolution: he violates the decrees of authoritarian
convention and law, but in such a way that they remain in place,
still dictating his actions-be those actions obedient or reactive. He
would do better to expose what he is and wants to the whole world
without guilt or remorse, and demand that it find a place for him and
his desires, whatever they might be—then his own struggle could be
the starting point for a revolution in human relationships from which
everyone might benefit, not just a flash of isolated passion and
insurgency to be stomped out before it even becomes aware of itself.
Let us shelter and defend him from the shaming of this society
whenever he does step forward, so that he may do so-for he acts, as
we do, out of a passion burning unquenchably for a new world.
"Hell yes I cheated!"
[END QUOTE]
No Let's shun the idiot and for awhile along with the rest of
these idiots pushing this agenda who don't give a fuck about the
consequences of the future generations and just what a complete
utterly disrupting recipe a disaster this all is.
No comments:
Post a Comment