Friday, March 27, 2015

The political correctness of Eugene Weekly and other shill media

Predictable clockwork coroporate shill media, not a shred of plausibility of a correlation between atrazine and homosexuality and transgenderism among humans is ever dared to be mentioned here:

Atrazine Wars

Scientist Tyrone Hayes speaks in Eugene
Tyrone Hayes
Tyrone Hayes
Scientist Tyrone Hayes reels off the list of effects on amphibians, rats and humans that he and other researchers have linked to the chemical atrazine. They include breast cancer, prostate cancer, decreased sperm counts, impaired fertility, a reduction in masculine features as well as abortion in pregnant rats exposed to the chemical, to name a few.
Atrazine is one of the pesticides found in the urine of dozens of residents, including children, of rural Triangle Lake, just west of Eugene.
Hayes, who will be coming to University of Oregon, Eugene as well as Triangle Lake this week to give several talks, is an amphibian developmental endocrinologist, a Harvard grad and a professor in the Department of Integrative Biology at Berkeley with a long list of publications in scientific journals. And, thanks to his research, he is persona non grata to chemical giant Syngenta, atrazine’s developer.
Residents of Triangle Lake have long complained about the effects of aerial pesticide sprays that they say drift onto their houses and farms and into their water and their bodies. It wasn’t until 41 of the residents had their own urine tested by Dana Barr of Emory University — who found atrazine and 2,4-D, two chemicals commonly sprayed in forestry applications — that the state began to investigate.
While the Oregon Health Authority has found that residents were exposed to these chemicals, according to the Highway 36 Exposure Investigation’s 2013 public health assessment, “We are unable to determine if the levels of atrazine metabolites found in participants’ urine in the spring of 2011 indicate harm to health. Unlike 2,4-D, there is no reference value for the atrazine metabolites tested for in participants’ urine.”
The investigation was also unable to test for other pesticides as the state says it could not find a lab capable of doing that and was “unable to determine the health effects of exposure to multiple pesticides at low doses.”
Hayes’ work allows state and federal agencies to better understand the possible effects on human health by chemicals such as atrazine. In 1997, Hayes was asked by Syngenta to conduct experiments on the herbicide atrazine, but when his research on frogs began to show that the chemical causes abnormal sexual development — a decrease in testosterone, hermaphroditism especially in males — he says the work was slowed down by a lack of disbursement of funds.
Hayes tells EW that Syngenta was “not too enthused by the work,” and it tried to manipulate his data and gag his research. He then began to conduct his research on atrazine independently of Syngenta. He says the company tried to discredit his work, hired other scientists to do “poorly conducted studies” and “eventually that spiraled into the company actually threatening me and even making threats of violence against my family.”
Hayes had long suspected Syngenta was targeting him. He says court documents have revealed an orchestrated multimillion-dollar campaign against him: Syngenta hacked his email, tried to purchase his name on the internet, hired scientists, pundits and PR people to link him to scandals, “storybook stuff out of movies.”
A February 2014 piece in The New Yorker delved into Syngenta’s attacks. The court documents used in the article came from a class-action lawsuit in the Midwest that Syngenta settled for $105 million for the costs of filtering atrazine from drinking water, though the company denies all wrongdoing.
While Syngenta points to studies — some of them which the company funded — that show atrazine is safe, other studies such as “Case-Control Study of Maternal Atrazine Exposure and Male Genital Malformations” in the American Journal of Medical Genetics show it is linked to a small penis, hypospadias (the penis opens in the wrong place) and cryptorchidism (undescended testicles).
Hayes didn’t take Syngenta’s targeting lying down. One thing he did was send emails to the company using hip-hop lyrics:
“aww shucks … i’m bouta handle my biz right now
see you bucked … wondering … ‘what it is right now?’
ya outa’ luck … bouta show you how it is right now
see you’re ****ed … (i didn’t pull out) and ya fulla my j*z right now!”
Hayes, who is African American, says, “They attacked me personally, and part of that attack was to try to make me feel isolated and try to make me feel what many minorities, professionals and otherwise, feel — this idea of you don’t belong and of course your work is wrong. You are not smart enough. You are not good enough.”
That line of attack didn’t work, Hayes says. “The mistake they made was I’ve been dealing with this all my life … this is something that I was over. I’m confident in who I am and where I am.” He used hip-hop rhymes because “I could express myself in my own way. … No matter what, my science was still good, the language of science is the language of science, and I can express that however I want.”
The emails “confused them a little bit,” Hayes laughs. “I think my response was one where they went ‘Whoa shit, what do we do with this guy now?’”
The residents of Triangle Lake and other rural communities around Oregon have also faced attempts to discredit them or discourage them from getting answers about the chemicals being sprayed in the area. “I think solidarity is important, connecting with other groups is important,” Hayes says. “If you are a smaller group, connect with larger groups.”
He says the type of campaign Syngenta waged against him is “sometimes a hard thing to believe,” but, according to Hayes, for Syngenta “this is an attack on their lifestyle and how they make their money.” Syngenta, the world’s largest maker of crop chemicals, reported a net profit for 2013 of $1.64 billion. “I think there’s no end to what they would do,” he adds.
Though he has been outspoken on getting the word out about the effects of atrazine, Hayes says it does not affect his objectivity as a scientist. “There are side effects and you should be informed and aware,” he says, calling his research an informed opinion.
 “You can decide whether or not you want to take Tylenol,” he says, “but right now you don’t have control over atrazine in your water.” Making sure people know about his atrazine research is “not a loss of objectivity, it’s a sense of responsibility.”
As part of Hayes’ visit to Eugene, he will participate in a “Witness to Action” bus tour to Triangle Lake with participants from communities around Oregon affected by pesticide sprays.


http://eugeneweekly.com/20141023/news-features/atrazine-wars


And also like clockwork  Amy Goodman and the rest of the Democracy Now Left Wing gatekeepers who promote Eve Ensler as a guest (who wrote the Hoochie Coochie sketch of the Vagina monologues that condones lesbian pedophiles preying on teenage girls who were child victims of male pedophiles)  doesn't seem to add up the population control agenda either.




By the way the conservative church going Mennonites of what was once Golden Harvest seeds sold out to Syngenta, leading good reason to believe the conclusions of youtube user chatzefratz that there's a vast predatory amount of Swiss nationalism to push this population control agnda. 


And if that isn't enough to add insult to injury to victims of homosexual coercion or homosexual pedophilia, Eugene Weekly had t publish this trend among some homosexual men who enjoy finding a heterosexual man who is conflicted and enjoy the feeling of conquest of recruiting the conflicted heterosexual man:


http://eugeneweekly.com/20150326/savage-love/massive-cock-blocks


Massive Cock Blocks

I found this in an online sex ad: “Straight guy with an addiction to massive cocks in my ass.” This “straight guy” went on to mention his girlfriend. Can a person really identify as straight while wanting to be fucked by men? I understand that straight guys can like ass play too, but it’s not like he wants to be pegged by his girlfriend or use a dildo on himself. He’s straight-up (heh-heh) looking for hung dudes to fuck his ass.
Jaded And Wondering, Dude’s Really On Pussy?
Can a person identify as straight while wanting to be fucked by men? Ha-ha-ha. Yes. I was pretending to be straight when I was 15, Pastor Ted “Meth and Man Ass” Haggard was pretending to be straight when he was 45, and Congressman Aaron Schock is still pretending to be straight.
As for the guy behind that online sex ad: He is most likely bisexual and rounding himself down to straight. There’s a much smaller chance he’s straight and it isn’t the massive cocks that turn him on, JAWDROP, but the boundary-shattering/identity-upending violation that being pounded by massive cocks represents. It could also be a “forced bi” thing, and he’s doing this to please a dominant girlfriend. Or—and this is a lot likelier than straight or forced bi—he’s a gay guy who pretends to be a straight guy online because the ruse attracts gay and bi guys turned on by the boundary-crossing/identity-upending violation that shoving their massive cocks up a straight guy’s ass represents.
Only way to know for sure: Ask him yourself. No guarantee you’ll get a straight answer, of course, but only he knows for sure what’s up with him. "

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

HETERO CENTRIC/HETERO CENTRIST COMES OUT OF THE CLOSET!



Basic Sexual ethics: 1. Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4. and
hopefully/preferably non-violent.

It is the intent of SpiralCosmosArt to ask that

extreme right wing bible thumping conservatives who hate non-
heterosexuals/homosexuals/transgenders/queers/lesbians/bisexuals etc.
and

extreme left wing liberals who want to militantly push the extreme opposite agenda and suffer
from heterophobia
to consider that sometimes non-heterosexuality (queering / homosexuality/ and transgenderism) is
coerced by “endocrine disruptors” that tweak and permanently warp the hormones of such people for
life, and a lot of other causal factors that are open to debate, often from cruel dirty tricks of
competition, abuse, and coercive population control agendas, being completely respectful of the fact
that there is good scientific reason that most a substantial number of people's sexual orientation really is a result of being“born
that way” and they really “don't have a choice”, and cannot change and are human beings who deserve
human rights like anyone else, including whatever perceived blessings they expect to get out of a State
sanctioned “marriage”, or even adoption rights of children if there is no monogamous heterosexual role
models or family life available worth a shit and 4 ethical principles of sex are never violated: 1.
Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4. preferably non-violen



Unless I am single and concerned about seeking out a monogamous heterosexual woman to seek to reciprocate my monogamous heterosexuality and have lots of good loving monogamous sex, which I often am, I usually don't really care what other people's sex life is like in their private life, Provided These 4 PRINCIPLES 1. between adult human beings, 2. mutual consensual and 3. private. 4. prefably non-violent  I am a libertarian in that regard.  I'm all in favor of legalizing state sanctioned marriage for gays, but find it kind of amusing how a gay man told me once "gay people should have the right to get screwd by the state like straight people."  State approval for what adults sex life is designed to fuck over those who seek such approval and has nothing to do with whether or not they are gay or straight.

 I stand by the notion heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal for human survival given all other things being equal.  It is important that I stress "all other things being equal".  I believe heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal, without going into the graphic details of anatomical reasons,  for the most simple reason: because heterosexual monogamy involves only 2 party extreme love and pleasure energy transaction of co-creators for reproduction with energy and bodies that compliments each other to produce synergy, where as homosexuals don't reproduce on their own and need 3rd party sperm donation to reproduce, and often sex toys a lot like some people are born into this world needing prosthetic limbs.  Promiscuous non-monogamy (whether gay or straight) seems to complicate the energy exchange dilluting the possiblities of optimum synergy and love with much risk of that love being dilluted, subverted and undermined through jealousy while trying to juggle multiple partners in vain.

For those who disagree with heterosexual monogamy being optimal and ideal.  Perhaps your idea of evidence for failed heterosexual monogamous societies is pointing out all the legacies of failed societies rather than looking at the principles of failed gender balance? without taking into account and consideration that a lot of the failed heterosexual societies are really infested with a lot of pedophiles who are coercing children into homosexuality?

Think about how subversive and cruel pedophilia is.

 Maybe you are not taking into account the brutal mating competition done by heterosexuals who are really closet pedophiles, pedophiles who could be into closet homosexual or heterosexual pedophile predation?


Do you consider the damage and confusion child victims of sex offender causes?  Through somekind of brutal mating competition?

You want evidence?  What kind of historical anecdote after anecdote of polyamorous/polygamous/ and/or homosexual  societies where there is trouble do you need?  For now to start: I can think of survivor's of fundemental Mormon polygamy cults, a lot of organized religions,and maybe some others anecdotes where especially the children from such promiscuous unions are in endless feuds with their siblings indoctrinated by their parents' jealousy issues.  Personally, a lot of the aftermath generation X's of the free love generation of the babyboomers have had similar issues.

When put the question is homosexuality a sin?  or Is homosexuality immoral?   I have to be completely true to the reality that I do not know because I can never know what it is to be homosexual, but I do know how suggestible and vulnerable children can be, and I do know how innocent people are sometimes born into the world with some kind of disability or injury with no cure through no fault of their own sometimes. I do know something about heterophobia in the sense that there is always a fear of an unwanted or difficult pregnancy: so when people throw around the buzzword "homophobia" it kind of makes me wonder wtf? WTF makes you so free of heterophobia? as though any alleged homophobia from me is any worse than your own heterophobia?

Heterophobia is real, and everyone suffers from it from some degree or another to a certain degree.  Who doesn't fear unwanted pregnancies?  Who isn't afraid of certain people breeding unsustainably?


Pedophiles, those into bestiality, and a lot of other sex offenders deserve to be annihilated off the face of the earth because it is a completely depraved level of desensitivity that corrodes the world.  Does that mean executions?  I don't know. But definitely quarantining them and rehabilitating them some way if that is even remotely possible.   Children's sexuality is underdeveloped, the child has no way of knowing what's going on.   Same with animals.  Child sex abuse is extremely cruel given how vulnerable and suggestible children are.


 There is population control agendas with all sorts of contaminents in the environment which is part of Agenda 21. Some homosexuals have no problem with me believing this and completely agree because they are completely adult consenting beings in their sex life who know damn well they don't have a choice because their hormones are hardwired and tweaked that way from birth from endocrine disruptors and other contaminents in the environment.  Such homosexuals are not likely to change. But then there are another category of people who insist "don't knock being gay until you try it".    That attitude is prevalent and endemic. It's totally pushed in the propaganda. There is an element that insinuates by the very nature of peer pressure that those who've grown up with bad experiences with the opposite gender can rationalize coping out of ideals and principles of optimum sexuality remaining monogamous and heterosexual, and convince themselves homosexuality is right for them, when in reality they are confused souls.  Those people are fucked in the head. So what if I believe that they're fucked in the head?


I consider homosexuality to more often than not, especially among those homosexuals who keep their sex life exclusively between adults and don't recruit, to be an untreatable injury or disability from a polluted world full of contaminants known as "endocrine disruptors" and sometimes horrible experiences with the opposite gender or unmet emotional affirmations from the same gender growing up as a child, but that by NO MEANS do I believe most homosexuals have choice to be gay.  Again: I don't judge and blame them for being gay in this mixed up world provided the 4 mentioned principles I listed about. But it's stupid to say that homosexuality is never coerced. A lot of adult mutual consenting gay people who are born that way who don't recruit and who are totally against pedophiles are some of the most hospitable selfless people I've ever met because they have solidarity with the crippled and admit to themselves of their crippled less than optimal and ideal conditioned.  If they could suddenly flawlessly grow the opposite sex organs for their lover they'd gladly do so and be heterosexual they would, but often there's no surgery that can ever do that without adverse complications and in such cases I applaud them for their open, out of the closet, claims of complete naturally born gay pride because they really don't have a choice.