(REPOST) HETERO CENTRIC/HETERO CENTRIST COMES OUT OF THE CLOSET!
Basic Sexual ethics: 1. Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4. and
hopefully/preferably non-violent.
It is the intent of SpiralCosmosArt to ask that
•
extreme right wing bible thumping conservatives who hate non-
heterosexuals/homosexuals/transgenders/queers/lesbians/bisexuals etc.
and
•
extreme left wing liberals who want to militantly push the extreme opposite agenda and suffer
from heterophobia
to consider that sometimes non-heterosexuality (queering / homosexuality/ and transgenderism) is
coerced by “endocrine disruptors” that tweak and permanently warp the hormones of such people for
life, and a lot of other causal factors that are open to debate, often from cruel dirty tricks of
competition, abuse, and coercive population control agendas, being completely respectful of the fact
that there is good scientific reason that
most a substantial number of people's sexual orientation really is a result of being“born
that way” and they really “don't have a choice”, and cannot change and are human beings who deserve
human rights like anyone else, including whatever perceived blessings they expect to get out of a State
sanctioned “marriage”, or even adoption rights of children if there is no monogamous heterosexual role
models or family life available worth a shit and 4 ethical principles of sex are never violated: 1.
Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual and 3. in Private. 4. preferably non-violen
Unless I am single and concerned about seeking out a monogamous
heterosexual woman to seek to reciprocate my monogamous heterosexuality
and have lots of good loving monogamous sex, which I often am, I usually
don't really care what other people's sex life is like in their private
life, Provided These 4 PRINCIPLES 1. between adult human beings, 2.
mutual consensual and 3. private. 4. prefably non-violent I am a
libertarian in that regard. I'm all in favor of legalizing state
sanctioned marriage for gays, but find it kind of amusing how a gay man
told me once "gay people should have the right to get screwd by the
state like straight people." State approval for what adults sex life is
designed to fuck over those who seek such approval and has nothing to
do with whether or not they are gay or straight.
I stand by the
notion heterosexual monogamy is optimum and ideal for human survival
given all other things being equal. It is important that I stress "all
other things being equal". I believe heterosexual monogamy is optimum
and ideal, without going into the graphic details of anatomical
reasons, for the most simple reason: because heterosexual monogamy
involves only 2 party extreme love and pleasure energy transaction of
co-creators for reproduction with energy and bodies that compliments
each other to produce synergy, where as homosexuals don't reproduce on
their own and need 3rd party sperm donation to reproduce, and often sex
toys a lot like some people are born into this world needing prosthetic
limbs. Promiscuous non-monogamy (whether gay or straight) seems to
complicate the energy exchange dilluting the possiblities of optimum
synergy and love with much risk of that love being dilluted, subverted
and undermined through jealousy while trying to juggle multiple partners
in vain.
For those who disagree with heterosexual monogamy being
optimal and ideal. Perhaps your idea of evidence for failed
heterosexual monogamous societies is pointing out all the legacies of
failed societies rather than looking at the principles of failed gender
balance? without taking into account and consideration that a lot of the
failed heterosexual societies are really infested with a lot of
pedophiles who are coercing children into homosexuality?
Think about how subversive and cruel pedophilia is.
Maybe
you are not taking into account the brutal mating competition done by
heterosexuals who are really closet pedophiles, pedophiles who could be
into closet homosexual or heterosexual pedophile predation?
Do you consider the damage and confusion child victims of sex offender causes? Through somekind of brutal mating competition?
You
want evidence? What kind of historical anecdote after anecdote of
polyamorous/polygamous/ and/or homosexual societies where there is
trouble do you need? For now to start: I can think of survivor's of
fundemental Mormon polygamy cults, a lot of organized religions,and
maybe some others anecdotes where especially the children from such
promiscuous unions are in endless feuds with their siblings
indoctrinated by their parents' jealousy issues. Personally, a lot of
the aftermath generation X's of the free love generation of the
babyboomers have had similar issues.
When put the question is
homosexuality a sin? or Is homosexuality immoral? I have to be
completely true to the reality that I do not know because I can never
know what it is to be homosexual, but I do know how suggestible and
vulnerable children can be, and I do know how innocent people are
sometimes born into the world with some kind of disability or injury
with no cure through no fault of their own sometimes. I do know
something about heterophobia in the sense that there is always a fear of
an unwanted or difficult pregnancy: so when people throw around the
buzzword "homophobia" it kind of makes me wonder wtf? WTF makes you so
free of heterophobia? as though any alleged homophobia from me is any
worse than your own heterophobia?
Heterophobia is real, and
everyone suffers from it from some degree or another to a certain
degree. Who doesn't fear unwanted pregnancies? Who isn't afraid of
certain people breeding unsustainably?
Pedophiles, those into
bestiality, and a lot of other sex offenders deserve to be annihilated
off the face of the earth because it is a completely depraved level of
desensitivity that corrodes the world. Does that mean executions? I
don't know. But definitely quarantining them and rehabilitating them
some way if that is even remotely possible. Children's sexuality is
underdeveloped, the child has no way of knowing what's going on. Same
with animals. Child sex abuse is extremely cruel given how vulnerable
and suggestible children are.
There is population control
agendas with all sorts of contaminents in the environment which is part
of Agenda 21. Some homosexuals have no problem with me believing this
and completely agree because they are completely adult consenting beings
in their sex life who know damn well they don't have a choice because
their hormones are hardwired and tweaked that way from birth from
endocrine disruptors and other contaminents in the environment. Such
homosexuals are not likely to change. But then there are another
category of people who insist "don't knock being gay until you try
it". That attitude is prevalent and endemic. It's totally pushed in
the propaganda. There is an element that insinuates by the very nature
of peer pressure that those who've grown up with bad experiences with
the opposite gender can rationalize coping out of ideals and principles
of optimum sexuality remaining monogamous and heterosexual, and convince
themselves homosexuality is right for them, when in reality they are
confused souls. Those people are fucked in the head. So what if I
believe that they're fucked in the head?
I consider
homosexuality to more often than not, especially among those homosexuals
who keep their sex life exclusively between adults and don't recruit,
to be an untreatable injury or disability from a polluted world full of
contaminants known as "endocrine disruptors" and sometimes horrible
experiences with the opposite gender or unmet emotional affirmations
from the same gender growing up as a child, but that by NO MEANS do I
believe most homosexuals have choice to be gay. Again: I don't judge
and blame them for being gay in this mixed up world provided the 4
mentioned principles I listed about. But it's stupid to say that
homosexuality is never coerced. A lot of adult mutual consenting gay
people who are born that way who don't recruit and who are totally
against pedophiles are some of the most hospitable selfless people I've
ever met because they have solidarity with the crippled and admit to
themselves of their crippled less than optimal and ideal conditioned.
If they could suddenly flawlessly grow the opposite sex organs for their
lover they'd gladly do so and be heterosexual they would, but often
there's no surgery that can ever do that without adverse complications
and in such cases I applaud them for their open, out of the closet,
claims of complete naturally born gay pride because they really don't
have a choice.
