If this daughter of 2 mommies felt
like she would have been better off if she grew up with parents who are a
Mom and Dad, WHO are these politically correct assholes to dare condem
her for telling her experience AND say it's wrong? (espeically which
they aren't the least bit privy to)?
+spiralcosmosart
Well I should have grown up with Homo Parents!, I was Screaming in the
womb, any idiot would know, I was a "Special Baby", That doesn't mean
I'm going to go Public & rip my Hetero Parents to shreads, Heather
is a Little Princess with a Daddy Fixation. It's her HUSBAND people
should feel sorry for, not her.
You were not in her head when she was a
child growing up. She wished she had a traditional nuclear family.
Something didn't seem right to her without a father. Her life, her
feelings: who are you to judge?
+spiralcosmosart
They aren't condemning her because she spoke out against but because
HER DAD LEFT. Her father CHOSE NOT to be apart of her life it has
nothing to do with her moms. HER DAD said fuck this and fuck the kid and
when he got a divorced disappeared and never wanted anything to do with
her. Its like saying well my dog ran away and my parents got a cat so
there should a law cause i lost my dog and got stuck with a cat and
since it wasnt what i wanted im mad. . .NO her dad was a dick don't
blame the fact your mom found love again to make you think you have some
resolution. If she had bad parents sure i could see her having an issue
if any. . .But the fact that you want dads for people because you didnt
have one it is stupid. What if their dad leaves? what is their is a
dick? what if their dad acts like yours and says fuck this and moves on?
like no having a mom and dad doesnt make it better. And to down your
moms who raised you and loved cause your dad didn't want you is shameful
and she should feel bad. You just told your mom i know my dad was a
dick and left me but i hate you
+Ju'Nelle Brown
I'm sure there are some very loving homosexual parents who raise
children entirely on their own. And I have nothing against the legality
of homosexuals raising children provided they don't abuse them or
coerce them into normalizing homosexuality, but she discovered lacking a
father was neither optimal nor ideal (all other things being equal).
I am a shameless heterocentric person because I happen to believe
optimal and ideal (all things being equal) will always be monogamous
heterosexual nuclear family. It's a simple matter of gender balance.
There are distinct compliment different energies when you are the one
who bears a pregnancy, nurses the child with your tits, and the one that
simply does the fertilizing. I want familes with 1 biological dad
and 1 biological mom for people because there are distinct differences
that compliment gender balance. Homosexuality is a bit gender
estrangement. I write about this elaborately and do my part to
distinguish myself the stereotypical bible thumping homophobes: http://heterocentricpride.blogspot.com/2015_01_01_archive.html
Then what of adoptive parent? single
parents, and step parents? They don't follow your ideal so what of
those children who turn out fine from that?
And what of the children who have one of both and are fucked up people?
I.E. H.H. Holmes America's 1st serial killer had a biological mom and
dad who were good people but didn't pay enough attention to their son.
He went on to murder people. (Not saying this is the norm of hetero
families) But i'm saying no type of family is better and for her to use
the fact she has a deadbeat dad is invalid. What happened to her has
nothing to do with the issue she is fighting for she should be making a
petition against bad parents or deadbeat dads. Not gay marriage. Her dad
sucked and if her mom was straight and divorced her dad he would have
still not been there.
I thank you for not being a homophobic but to treat another differently
in status based of not being what you want is still prejudice and still
just as bad. I don't need someone saying i can have kids that is cool
but i think it is better if your kids have a mom and dad. NO, mind your
business, if kids are in a loving home then they are in an EQUALLY good
home as any other loving home. period. Also Gender is socially
constructed so it isnt like men and women arent equal there is no role
women and men can specifically play. So what is the balanced of gender?
the traditional gender roles that suck and aren't even legitimate?
+Ju'Nelle Brown
No you don't care about logic. You obviously don't dare take the to
read my blog and pay attention to my word choices. And you don't care
to look at history and the decline of Roman civilization and the
pedophilia and homosexual coercion that went on then.
"When put the question is homosexuality a sin? or Is homosexuality
immoral? I have to be completely true to the reality that I do not
know because I can never know what it is to be homosexual, but I do know
how suggestible and vulnerable children can be, and I do know how
innocent people are sometimes born into the world with some kind of
disability or injury with no cure through no fault of their own
sometimes. I do know something about heterophobia in the sense that
there is always a fear of an unwanted or difficult pregnancy: so when
people throw around the buzzword "homophobia" it kind of makes me wonder
wtf? WTF makes you so free of heterophobia? as though any alleged
homophobia from me is any worse than your own heterophobia? "
ESPECIALLY, when you completely disrespect this woman's own personal
experience growing up with a biological mom and a stepmom, and no
biological dad. There is population control
agendas with all sorts of contaminents in the environment which is part
of Agenda 21. Some homosexuals have no problem with me believing this
and completely agree because they are completely adult consenting beings
in their sex life who know damn well they don't have a choice because
their hormones are hardwired and tweaked that way from birth from
endocrine disruptors and other contaminents in the environment. Such
homosexuals are not likely to change. [AND I RESPECT THose homosexuals
FOR THAT trueness to their identity] But then there are another
category of people who insist "don't knock being gay until you try
it". That attitude is prevalent and endemic. It's totally pushed in
the propaganda. There is an element that insinuates by the very nature
of peer pressure that those who've grown up with bad experiences with
the opposite gender can rationalize coping out of ideals and principles
of optimum sexuality remaining monogamous and heterosexual, and convince
themselves homosexuality is right for them, when in reality they are
confused souls. Those people are fucked in the head. So what ifIbelieve
that they're fucked in the head?
+Martha Marvelette
Medieval morality? Do you know anything about how the Medieval
feudalism and dark ages began? It was the aftermath of the fall of the
Roman Empire. History? or herstory? One of the oldest dirtiest
tricks of a conquering imperialistic culture that eventually leads to
its downfall, which happened in Rome and Greek from the Spartans to
Alexander the Great's conquest, is for the men to rape other men and
subjegate the boys in pedophile bitch boy coercion (Pederasty) If the
American military keeps it's rape culture of men raping other men, we're
all doomed. Despite of me saying that, I consider
homosexuality to more often than not, especially among those homosexuals
who keep their sex life exclusively between adults and don't recruit,
to be an untreatable injury or disability from a polluted world full of
contaminants known as "endocrine disruptors" and sometimes horrible
experiences with the opposite gender or unmet emotional affirmations
from the same gender growing up as a child, but that by NO MEANS do I
believe most homosexuals have choice to be gay. Again: I don't judge
and blame them for being gay in this mixed up world provided the 4
mentioned principles I listed about (4 PRINCIPLES 1. between adult human
beings, 2. mutual consensual and 3. private. 4. prefably non-violent) I
am a
libertarian in that regard. I'm all in favor of legalizing state
sanctioned marriage for gays, but find it kind of amusing how a gay man
told me once "gay people should have the right to get screwd by the
state like straight people." State approval for what adults sex life is
designed to fuck over those who seek such approval and has nothing to
do with whether or not they are gay or straight.. But it's stupid to say
that
homosexuality is never coerced. A lot of adult mutual consenting gay
people who are born that way who don't recruit and who are totally
against pedophiles are some of the most hospitable selfless people I've
ever met because they have solidarity with the crippled and admit to
themselves of their crippled less than optimal and ideal conditioned.
If they could suddenly flawlessly grow the opposite sex organs for their
lover they'd gladly do so and be heterosexual they would, but often
there's no surgery that can ever do that without adverse complications
and in such cases I applaud them for their open, out of the closet,
claims of complete naturally born gay pride because they really don't
have a choice.
Okay first Rome did rape but they also
didnt know what homosexuality was at the time. They believed in being
with women but they believed that sex was sex it has nothing to do with
homosexuality. Most of the boys raped were murdered once they got to
old, Also the military rapes women just as often as men so if the
military allows rape period it will be an issue. Matter of fact rape is
an issue period in america or world wide period of either and all
genders.
The raping of men has nothing to do with homosexuality sometimes men who
consider themselves straight rape both genders.. You are back tracking
and seem to be unsure in your views. Granted you can be a little of both
but you need to elaborate more if you are going to do so.
Homosexuality is no more coreced than heterosexuality which is
technically more pushed my media and people's reigious agendas who feel
the need to do so.
Now i know no homosexual person who would want to change genders to be
with there lovers because their lover would still be gay. Also those
people if they feel that way about their bodies they are transgender or
bi-gendered. Besides homosexual people have not ideal or optimal
situations because are people who try to speak for them, don't allow
them the same basic human rights, and want to make them seem 2nd hand
compared to straight people. Not because they are born in thw wrong body
like you somewhat alluding to. I can tell you as someone who is a
lesbian i would never want to be a dude. I am a woman and feel like a
woman, i want to be a mom one day, and own a business. but i would never
want to change genders to be with my girlfriend......I just want to be
with her without people acting like it will some how ruin america or is
connected to deep haterd or hurt.
Hopefully you completely consensual homosexuals who are adults advocate
against pedophilia and all forms of coercion.. I try and make myself
perfectly clear and draw line that I really respect the homosexuals who
are completely against coercion or manipulation of all kinds that cause
gender estrangement or gender imbalance (and that's not simply a
physical concept about yin and yang energies complimenting each other).
I don't understand any man who would dare donate sperm to bring
another bastard into this world, but I've met some bastards who grow up
to be good people anyways..
So are you caling children born via
the sperm bank to couples of all kinds Bastards? Cause that is uncalled
for and not even alright. You should be ashamed to call child that. You
deserve no respect if you do.
Also i no person homosexual or any sexuality who is a good person who
believes in anything pedo. . .Umm that can be a homosexual or
heterosexual thing and only pedos condone it. The fact that you say
those things means you have some sick twisted view on homosexuality.
Also i have been gay since i born so i have always engaged in homosexual
relations (not sex i am waiting till marriage) but kissing, liking,
dating etc. SO considering i am in college and my gf is a little older i
am consentual and so is she. But what to say of a 16 year old?
I also believe that it is fine to teach kids of different people.
Meaning kids are allowed to learn of different family types just like
they are races. I dont believe corecing anything. People are who they
are and should i be corecing heterosexuality like bigots do?
+Ju'Nelle Brown
Oh my, my "Yin Yang" is out of Whack, I feel like such a Bastard. The
only real Victim in this story is Heather's Husband, He's stuck with a
Childish Psychopath looking for a Father Figure, a Jodi Arias/ Casey
Anthony wanna be.
+Ju'Nelle Brown
Ju'nelle Brown asks: So are you caling children born via the sperm
bank to couples of all kinds Bastards? No, but IF that "sperm bank
donor" [a.ka. the biological father who masturbates so some woman can
do a turkey baster conception] is not the lover and partner of the
mother, who is actively involved in raising the child, yeah that child
is a bastard to his biological father. Absolutely no Father = complete
bastard. If a child grows up without an example and some positive role
model of a father figure and a mother figure loving each other
intimately, than that's a debilitating factor that is neither ideal nor
optimum for human survival and progress. That doesn't mean the child
won't overcome that challenge. And that's why I keep repeating "ideal
and optimum" and "all other things equal". Gender balance is very near
and dear to my heart and it's a damn shame the world is so mixed up and
sick and far from ideal or optimum. Bible thumping sanctimonious
asshole fake christians and gender supremacist hating ultra militant
homosexuals can both go to hell. It's so disgusting how they throw
this buzzword homophobia when the worst homophobia has a pretty twisted
heterophobic shadow to it.
+Martha Marvelette
Gender balance and of male and female energy is a concept of everything
sacred, natural, and holy. And it's not necessarily a sexual thing.
Gender estrangement i bad and it happens and with homosexuality: there
is an obvious physical component to gender estrangement that is suspect.
Homosexuality = 100% sterile sex with no reproductive results.
I'm sorry but you never call a child a
bastard. So what if they don't have a dad? If a women decides she can
parent alone or if two women decide to have a kid together those
children are not bastards. Anyone who would call a child that via such
an old-school mentality has no class or any respect given from me. Do
yourself a favor and rethink how you talk about children. I for one
can't even see anything you say as vaild for you lack all merit now.
And having a mom and dad is no better than having two of one or the
other or having just one. You sounds like someone i don't want ever
teaching parenting to anyone. Not to mention having a gender balance
isnt proven to be ideal over any other family dynamic
+Ju'Nelle Brown
There's 2 types of coercion: There's overt rape and then there is
psychological rape. Homosexuality by default is suspect to whether
or not it was coerced because it's a completely 100% sterile form of
sex with no chance of continuing the reproduction of the human species.
I personally have met homosexuals who leveled with me and said to "I
can't be heterosexual" They said they tried to be hetero and wanted to
be heterosexual, but it didn't work out for them so they had to come
out of the closet.
+Ju'Nelle Brown
You say as a lesbian (a female homosexual) you never want to be a dude?
Really? If there was such a thing as a detachable biological living
penis that would allow either you or your lover to experience what it's
like to have a biological penis, where you or her orgasms through the
penis, (but you could detach it re-attach it as easily as you do with
strap on dildos), you're saying you would never have sex with that?
Good Lord how limited are you
"spiralcosmosart", Try having someone eat your Box till your nose
bleeds, You'll never want to see another "Penis" for as long as you
live!
+Ju'Nelle Brown
My mother was an adoptee whose information about her heredity and a lot
of my heredity is being withheld by the State of Colorado. I totally
support "Bastard Nation", an advocacy group for adoptee's rights. I am
effectively a bastard for a lot of the emotional support I didn't get
from my dad when I needed it the most. I don't use the pejorative
"bastard" to insult or stigmatize children. I don't taunt children with
absent fathers with that term, but let's calll a spade, children ARE
better off with both a father and a mother and without a father they are
bastards. If there was a nice concise and accurate infammatory
TRUTHFUL word THAT EXPRESSES the TRUTH about being motherless as at
least as bad as being a bastard, I'D USE THAT WORD TOO. And I use
the to term to raise awareness to importance of having both a good
father and mother active as ane essential component in the child's life
growing up. Fuck the politically correct BULL SHIT, by these men
hating HETEROphobic feminists who want to destroy the sacredness of a
genderbalanced family. You've shown your contempt for me CLEAR, and now
my contempt for you is CLEAR! Goodbye Ju'nelle!
Goodbye to you as well. I support that
child does not need both to be well adjusted and i am secure in the
fact that i think anyone who uses a cuss word to refer to children is
not someone i wouldnt not show contempt. For but i hold no contempt i
just don't give you any merit which i am allowed to do.
Lesbian Mom should have shopped at the
Sperm Bank, she could have avoided the Poor Me Princess Gene that seems
to dominate Miss Heathers Life. A Lesbian daughter would have been so
much easier too!
+Martha Marvelette
I get it? Sounds like a bunch of heterophobic misandronist hate
rhetoric Men are just sperm donors? Just milk em' for their gism?
Don't have any true bonding between the 2 complimentary and opposite
genders.
+spiralcosmosart
Any "Bond" between 2 Loving Parents is a good thing, It doesn't depend
on the Orientation of the couple. Heather's Daddy didn't want to be
anything more than a "Jizz" donation, he was smart, Heather is a
simpering, spoiled cry baby, I'm sure Daddy's life was much better
without her.
heterocentric heterosexual reality versus wikipedia's politically correct demonization of heterosexual idealist/optimists like me:
Here's as simple as it gets for me: Since homosexuals don't reproduce by themselves naturally, heterosexuality, especially monogamous heterosexuality, seems perfectly ideal and optimum for the human race: all other things equal!
Human reproduction seems hindered, convoluted, complicated, and prone to problems that are not as likely to occurr if 1 adult man and 1 adult woman loved each other for life and produced children from that union. It's a simple matter of the closest distance between 2 different opposite complimentary reproductive ingredients and a loving wholesome understanding between those who have that reproductive experience.
LBGTQ OR Homosexual customers of my art are welcome to decorate their weddings or homes with my art. You're all free to do so. Penn Jillette put it perfectly right here: "there is more to gay sex than cake and flowers. these people are not being asked to engage in gay sex or even endorse gay sex" - Penn Jillette
A lot of my artwork is heterocentric and might turn off a lot of LBGT people, but please don't let that think you are unwelcome to download and alter free samples of my art http://spiralcosmosart.deviantart.com regardles of who you are, I don't discriminate:
A customer is a customer whose business with the product once the transaction is given is his own damn business, but just don't expect me to go out of my way to design slogans like "double dong strap on banging is fun between 2 women" or "hershey highway pounding partnership is fun between 2 men."
+ProSecondAmendmenthttp://heterocentricpride.blogspot.com/
Basic Sexual ethics: 1. Between adult humans 2. mutual consensual
and 3. in Private. 4. and hopefully non-violent. It is the intent of
SpiralCosmosArt to ask that extreme right wing bible thumping
conservatives who hate
non-heterosexuals/homosexuals/transgenders/queers/lesbians/bisexuals
etc. and extreme left wing liberals who want to militantly push the
extreme opposite agenda and suffer from heterophobia to consider that
sometimes non-heterosexuality (queering / homosexuality/ and
transgenderism) is coerced by “endocrine disruptors” that tweak and
permanently warp the hormones of such people for life http://www.drcurtisduncan.com/2014/11/homosexuality-and-chemical-manipulation.html,
and a lot of other causal factors that are open to debate, often from
cruel dirty tricks of competition, abuse, and coercive population
control agendas, being completely respectful of the fact that there is
good scientific reason that most people's sexual orientation really is a
result of being“born that way” and they really “don't have a choice”,
and cannot change and are human beings who deserve human rights like
anyone else, including whatever perceived blessings they expect to get
out of a State sanctioned “marriage”, or even adoption rights of
children if there is no monogamous heterosexual role models or family
life available and they would otherwise be abused: 4 ethical principles
of sex are never violated: 1. Between adult humans 2. mutual
consensual and 3. in Private. 4. preferably non-violent
+ProSecondAmendment
There is no worse demonic perversion than the perversion of humungous
Corporate Agribusinesses like Syngenta and Monsanto that pollute the
environment with hideous chemicals. These people coerce homosexuality
and they are the real pedophile culprits far worse than those born with
the unfortunate incurable birth defects of homosexuality.
+spiralcosmosart
I agree with you on the evils of corporations but homosexuality is
nothing more than an act of rebellion against the moral truth. It is far
from genetic but merely demonic influence within a persons life. They
can choose to obey the temptation of perverse immorality or not.
+ProSecondAmendment
My question is who is more evil? Someone who works for an employer who
poisons the population with toxins that cause the scientific birth
defect of homosexual tendencies? The Pedophiles who secretly coerce
people into homosexuality? Or do you point fingers at the the adult
homosexuals who are completely consensual and mongamous and tell them
they are cursed and vile when they're only the tip of the iceberg. My
own conservative Christian Aunt is married to a shill for the Syngenta
corporation in Illinois. Their children (my cousins) and them are all
good heterosexual Christians, but they are complacent greedy idiots who
coerce homosexuality / transgenderism worse than a lot of homosexuals,
because their employer pushes atrazine and glyphosphate and endless
monoculture gmo corn.
+spiralcosmosart
The wicked heart corrupts our food supply for the love of money. But
you're saying that toixns create homosexuality. That's just not a
scientific fact. I agree toxins cause birth defects but morals are
different than physical issues. It's a spiritual issue and both are
playing God. One is playing God with other people's food and homosexuals
are playing God in claiming they can have unions outside of the design
God created us to have.
From what I understand on the topic of
"endocrine disruptors" it's entirely plausible that toxins in the
environment is all part of U.N. Agenda 21 population control. I don't
believe it is God's plan for anyone to be homosexual either, but if all
you do is condem homosexuality without critically considering coercive
factors about gender estrangement, mating competion, and pedophilia,
you're no Christian at all. From what I understand about the true
Jesus, he lived in the time of a wicked "civilization" known as the
Roman empire when homosexuality and sexual vices were going virile as
such sins and immoral behavior are going virle now. And there's the
story when Jesus saved a prostitute from being Stoned to death knowing
she was a whore and slut, but also knowing she was human and didn't
deserve to be stoned to death, especially by people who were also
sinners.
+spiralcosmosart
I'm not going to debate the facts on homosexuality. The Word of God is
also a history book and throughout every other history book, we know
homosexuality has ALWAYS been immoral LONG BEFORE any toxins, gmo,
agenda 21 was ever in existence. Nice try though.
It's not against a person choosing to walk in sin as we all are dealing
with sin and need to repent.
I am against homosexuality trying to push their agenda, and immoral
perverse teachings and laws on our children and society. Even entering
the churches today and spreading lies as if Homosexuality is anything
God would ever accept into His Kingdom. That is a lie. Stay in the
closet or choose to come out which will always give society the right to
tell you what is right and wrong. They will be told the truth as it is
written in the Word of God form the Old to the New testament.
It's a sin unlike any other where you might not be murdering someone
but you are spreading a lifestyle that is extremely destructive and I
will never allow this agenda or any agenda for that matter including
agenda 21 to ever have it's way of deception without being exposed for
what it really is.
I think I proved your theory 100% incorrect seeing everything you used
to defend homosexuality did not exist 100 years ago so now you must
think of what might have influenced the gene pool back in the days of
Sodom and Gomorah seeing Monsanto was nowhere to be found. lol I can
point you in the right direction of what truly does influence someoone
to be homosexual and I assure you it is NOT related to anything you
mentioned. It is a spiritual demonic influence involving the spirit of
rebellion as one of the stronghold Principalities. If you google just
those words you will find some who have great insight and teachings on
how to be delivered from Homosexuality through deliverance. It is a
demonic oppressing spirit that drives people into this lust.
Of course there are foods that can raise or lower our estrogen and
testosterone levels but c'mon now. I'm fully aware of these things from a
nutritionist stand point and there is NO WAY the spirit, soul and heart
of a man can start to get gay tendencies because of a chemical or
toxin. Homosexuality is a spiritual issue.
No I'm not here to debate either: You
write: "....... so now you must think of what might have influenced the
gene pool back in the days of Sodom and Gomorah " Perhaps maybe back
then it was a debaucherous hedonistic orgy of a city that went horribly
wrong? So what? No I wasn't there back in those ancient biblical
times then and neither were you or were you. So I don't discredit the
weird perverse peer pressure and propogganda in the media that goes on
in Hollywood elsewhere. So what's your solution? A solution I think
we can both agree on, is PREVENT CHILD ABUSE!, especially violence and
PEDOPHILIA (whether heterosexual or homosexual). Supervise your
children. Don't leave them alone with some creepy suspicious unknown
babysitters or weird children. Don't leave them on overnights at some
stranger's home. Spend Quality time with your children. Teach your
children or the adults in your family and friends that have children
that children's private parts are truly private and have their place in a
lawful marriage when they become adults. And be an example that Mommy
and Daddy do indeed love each other and respect the opposite gender so
they see heterosexual monogamy as adults is obtainable and moral.
+spiralcosmosart
We won't agree on anything if you don't agree that homosexuality is
immoral on an absolute moral standard. As I said before, it's a
spiritual matter that can be dealt with in truth and spirit. A true
church will help people with this but it must not continue to be an
outward rebellion against God's commandment and design for mankind.
pedophilia (heterosexual or
homosexual) will always be far more immoral than adult homosexuality.
Pedophilia is a major cause of homosexuality. Yeah I can use the
word "immoral" and bring out my sanctimonious religion to describe
something that I think is sick and wrong like homosexuality? So what?
Does that make it so I'm doing my part to prevent homosexuality from
happening it any worse or better than you? It's just a word. I wish you
luck educating society to prevent gender estrangement and all the rest
of everything that makes normal heterosexuality difficult.
+spiralcosmosart
Yes pedophilia is no joke but if you look at the rebellious ways of the
homosexual agenda, you can clearly see how the end result in it's
teachings and influences, has in itself the destruction of children so
no matter what you find more evil, it's all very bad for the heart and
mind of a child. You cannot minimize homosexuality. That's the bottom
line here, as well as you cannot minimize the control they are trying to
push on those with religious convictions and I will not tolerate this
type of nonsense pushed on my family or friends. As you can see in
Indiana and this case, people are not going to tolerate it one bit and
if homosexual supporters want a war against Christian conservatives
they're going to eventually lose once and for all if it means blood shed
because those who fought to live in a free country are still going to
fight to make sure we keep it. No antichrist laws are going to take our
fundamental foundation away from us without blood.
+ProSecondAmendment
I don't believe for a moment that all homosexuals rationalized and
learned to enjoy their perverted form of sex in an overnight sudden
decision. There were factors in their life (often abuse from the
opposite gender or some kind of birth defect) that manipulated and
coerced an aversion for sex with the opposite gender. And you so called
Christians have a responsibility to keep pedophiles (who are often
wolves in sheeps clothing) out of your churches and out of schools and
other places where children are liable to be left alone with predators.
How do you ever expect at risk children (children from overworked
low-income families) to resist pedophile grooming or learn to report
pedophiles in schools and churches, when you're so busy condeming these
adult homosexuals and other failures of puritanical standards that fall
short of your ideal family life? If you can't get off your sanctimonious
high horse you're liable to pressure the child victims to never report
pedophiles soon enough because they're afraid of the stigma on them .
Yeah sure some weird normalization from society and peer pressure
probably takes it's toll too and in that sense, a homosexual act is a
choice and a bad choice. Some people are meant to learn lifes lessons
the hard way. Tough love for them.
+spiralcosmosart
Listen idiot. I knew you were a troll the minute you tried to bold face
lie about chemicals causing homosexuality. Next to the "homosexuality is
genetic" evolution lie that was proven a lie years ago.
Shut your ignorant mouth already. You're comparing evils only to change
the subject on this channel. We're not dealing pedofiles here nor
rapists nor murderers not stealing. We are dealing with HOMOSEXUALS
trying to push Christians around with bogus laws that violate our God
given rights.
Pedophiles are not the issue here and the church you refer to with a
history of pedophiles is not Christian but the Roman Catholic church. A
big difference you need an education on. Don't try to put all Christians
in the same box or you can get your teeth kicked in real quick. There
is pedophiles in all walks of life, all beliefs and has nothing to do
with those who are walking in the age of accountability, walking in
rebellion.
Now take a hike with your manipulating nonsense. I can't stand debating
idiots like you who don't have a leg to stand on yet continue to run
their mouth to try and cause confusion. I would have kept it nice but
you opened your punk ignorant mouth pointing the finger at Christians. I
saw it coming but I waited and the truth comes out eventually. You
can't hide from the spirit of discernment. Sooner or later you were
going to be exposed. Now scram troll boy
+spiralcosmosart
Far from it but I rest my case on exactly who you are. You have been
exposed here this day scum bag. Nice try though attempting to pursuade
the masses into beliving your lies. God has put me here on this earth to
expose people exactly like you.
You have two choices and none other.
1 repent and be saved
2 Rebel and be cast into the pit which is the lake of fire to serve as a
remembrance to those who were saved by mercy and grace through
repentance.
Your arrogant excuses blaming Christians or anyone but your self for
that matter , won't save you either. You have been warned.
Before I repent and am saved by the
commanding authority of such an absolute emmissary and messenger of the
true and one and only Jesus Christ, who you claim to know more about
than me. Whose physical form has been dead for over 2000 years. Could
you at least show your halo and prove to the world the sun really does
shine out of your ass?
Predictable clockwork coroporate shill media, not a shred of plausibility of a correlation between atrazine and homosexuality and transgenderism among humans is ever dared to be mentioned here:
Scientist Tyrone Hayes reels off the
list of effects on amphibians, rats and humans that he and other
researchers have linked to the chemical atrazine. They include breast
cancer, prostate cancer, decreased sperm counts, impaired fertility, a
reduction in masculine features as well as abortion in pregnant rats
exposed to the chemical, to name a few.
Atrazine is one of the pesticides found in the urine of dozens of
residents, including children, of rural Triangle Lake, just west of
Eugene.
Hayes, who will be coming to University of Oregon, Eugene as well as
Triangle Lake this week to give several talks, is an amphibian
developmental endocrinologist, a Harvard grad and a professor in the
Department of Integrative Biology at Berkeley with a long list of
publications in scientific journals. And, thanks to his research, he is
persona non grata to chemical giant Syngenta, atrazine’s developer.
Residents of Triangle Lake have long complained about the effects of
aerial pesticide sprays that they say drift onto their houses and farms
and into their water and their bodies. It wasn’t until 41 of the
residents had their own urine tested by Dana Barr of Emory University —
who found atrazine and 2,4-D, two chemicals commonly sprayed in forestry
applications — that the state began to investigate.
While the Oregon Health Authority has found that residents were
exposed to these chemicals, according to the Highway 36 Exposure
Investigation’s 2013 public health assessment, “We are unable to
determine if the levels of atrazine metabolites found in participants’
urine in the spring of 2011 indicate harm to health. Unlike 2,4-D, there
is no reference value for the atrazine metabolites tested for in
participants’ urine.”
The investigation was also unable to test for other pesticides as the
state says it could not find a lab capable of doing that and was
“unable to determine the health effects of exposure to multiple
pesticides at low doses.”
Hayes’ work allows state and federal agencies to better understand
the possible effects on human health by chemicals such as atrazine. In
1997, Hayes was asked by Syngenta to conduct experiments on the
herbicide atrazine, but when his research on frogs began to show that
the chemical causes abnormal sexual development — a decrease in
testosterone, hermaphroditism especially in males — he says the work was
slowed down by a lack of disbursement of funds.
Hayes tells EW that Syngenta was “not too enthused by the
work,” and it tried to manipulate his data and gag his research. He then
began to conduct his research on atrazine independently of Syngenta. He
says the company tried to discredit his work, hired other scientists to
do “poorly conducted studies” and “eventually that spiraled into the
company actually threatening me and even making threats of violence
against my family.”
Hayes had long suspected Syngenta was targeting him. He says court
documents have revealed an orchestrated multimillion-dollar campaign
against him: Syngenta hacked his email, tried to purchase his name on
the internet, hired scientists, pundits and PR people to link him to
scandals, “storybook stuff out of movies.”
A February 2014 piece in The New Yorker delved into Syngenta’s
attacks. The court documents used in the article came from a
class-action lawsuit in the Midwest that Syngenta settled for $105
million for the costs of filtering atrazine from drinking water, though
the company denies all wrongdoing.
While Syngenta points to studies — some of them which the company
funded — that show atrazine is safe, other studies such as “Case-Control
Study of Maternal Atrazine Exposure and Male Genital Malformations” in
the American Journal of Medical Genetics show it is linked to a
small penis, hypospadias (the penis opens in the wrong place) and
cryptorchidism (undescended testicles).
Hayes didn’t take Syngenta’s targeting lying down. One thing he did was send emails to the company using hip-hop lyrics:
“aww shucks … i’m bouta handle my biz right now
see you bucked … wondering … ‘what it is right now?’
ya outa’ luck … bouta show you how it is right now
see you’re ****ed … (i didn’t pull out) and ya fulla my j*z right now!”
Hayes, who is African American, says, “They attacked me personally,
and part of that attack was to try to make me feel isolated and try to
make me feel what many minorities, professionals and otherwise, feel
— this idea of you don’t belong and of course your work is wrong. You
are not smart enough. You are not good enough.”
That line of attack didn’t work, Hayes says. “The mistake they made
was I’ve been dealing with this all my life … this is something that I
was over. I’m confident in who I am and where I am.” He used hip-hop
rhymes because “I could express myself in my own way. … No matter what,
my science was still good, the language of science is the language of
science, and I can express that however I want.”
The emails “confused them a little bit,” Hayes laughs. “I think my
response was one where they went ‘Whoa shit, what do we do with this guy
now?’”
The residents of Triangle Lake and other rural communities around
Oregon have also faced attempts to discredit them or discourage them
from getting answers about the chemicals being sprayed in the area. “I
think solidarity is important, connecting with other groups is
important,” Hayes says. “If you are a smaller group, connect with larger
groups.”
He says the type of campaign Syngenta waged against him is “sometimes
a hard thing to believe,” but, according to Hayes, for Syngenta “this
is an attack on their lifestyle and how they make their money.”
Syngenta, the world’s largest maker of crop chemicals, reported a net
profit for 2013 of $1.64 billion. “I think there’s no end to what they
would do,” he adds.
Though he has been outspoken on getting the word out about the
effects of atrazine, Hayes says it does not affect his objectivity as a
scientist. “There are side effects and you should be informed and
aware,” he says, calling his research an informed opinion.
“You can decide whether or not you want to take Tylenol,” he says,
“but right now you don’t have control over atrazine in your water.”
Making sure people know about his atrazine research is “not a loss of
objectivity, it’s a sense of responsibility.”
As part of Hayes’ visit to Eugene, he will participate in a “Witness
to Action” bus tour to Triangle Lake with participants from communities
around Oregon affected by pesticide sprays.
And also like clockwork Amy Goodman and the rest of the Democracy Now Left Wing gatekeepers who promote Eve Ensler as a guest (who wrote the Hoochie Coochie sketch of the Vagina monologues that condones lesbian pedophiles preying on teenage girls who were child victims of male pedophiles) doesn't seem to add up the population control agenda either.
By the way the conservative church going Mennonites of what was once Golden Harvest seeds sold out to Syngenta, leading good reason to believe the conclusions of youtube user chatzefratz that there's a vast predatory amount of Swiss nationalism to push this population control agnda.
And if that isn't enough to add insult to injury to victims of homosexual coercion or homosexual pedophilia, Eugene Weekly had t publish this trend among some homosexual men who enjoy finding a heterosexual man who is conflicted and enjoy the feeling of conquest of recruiting the conflicted heterosexual man:
I found this in an online sex
ad: “Straight guy with an addiction to massive cocks in my ass.” This
“straight guy” went on to mention his girlfriend. Can a person really
identify as straight while wanting to be fucked by men? I understand
that straight guys can like ass play too, but it’s not like he wants to
be pegged by his girlfriend or use a dildo on himself. He’s straight-up
(heh-heh) looking for hung dudes to fuck his ass. Jaded And Wondering, Dude’s Really On Pussy?
Can a person identify as straight while wanting to be fucked by men?
Ha-ha-ha. Yes. I was pretending to be straight when I was 15, Pastor Ted
“Meth and Man Ass” Haggard was pretending to be straight when he was
45, and Congressman Aaron Schock is still pretending to be straight.
As for the guy behind that online sex ad: He is most likely bisexual
and rounding himself down to straight. There’s a much smaller chance
he’s straight and it isn’t the massive cocks that turn him on, JAWDROP,
but the boundary-shattering/identity-upending violation that being
pounded by massive cocks represents. It could also be a “forced bi”
thing, and he’s doing this to please a dominant girlfriend. Or—and this
is a lot likelier than straight or forced bi—he’s a gay guy who pretends
to be a straight guy online because the ruse attracts gay and bi guys
turned on by the boundary-crossing/identity-upending violation that
shoving their massive cocks up a straight guy’s ass represents.
Only way to know for sure: Ask him yourself. No guarantee you’ll get a
straight answer, of course, but only he knows for sure what’s up with
him. "
